
Montreal has formalized a robust framework for measuring, comparing, and ultimately reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from its building stock.
Bylaw 21-042 requires annual disclosure of energy data and introduces a GHG performance rating for each building. For owners, managers, and boards of directors, this is not just an administrative requirement: it is a strategic lever that guides investment decisions, communication with occupants, and medium-term asset value. Let’s take a look at what is changing and how to prepare in practical terms.
The rating is a public and intelligible translation of your greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity compared to similar assets. It has three objectives:
In practical terms, you continue to disclose your data exactly as before (via ESPM). The City calculates the rating based on this information; there is no “second declaration” dedicated to the rating. The tool and guides provided by the City define the scope (the entire building), the granularity (monthly), the required fields (usage, surface areas by usage, meters, etc.), and quality controls (ESPM verifier).
In short: disclosure feeds the rating. The more complete and accurate your data is, the more the rating reflects your operational reality—and the more relevant your “apples-to-apples” comparisons are.
The Quebec government’s 2025-2030 Implementation Plan (PEV 2030) includes, in action R3-060, the establishment of a provincial energy disclosure, rating, and performance system for commercial and institutional buildings.
The associated budgets are planned for 2025-2030, confirming the structural focus on transparency and performance in the building stock. Montreal is therefore aligning itself with this provincial trajectory: preparing for municipal ratings means anticipating the expectations of the provincial framework.
The quality of the rating depends directly on the quality of the data submitted. The City’s guides and support materials detail the following steps: Guides
Interpretation of “GHG intensity.” The central logic of the rating is based on emissions intensity relative to surface area (kg CO₂e/m²). This metric neutralizes size and allows for comparison between similar buildings (use, configuration), rather than judging gross consumption. In the Montreal context, municipal data aggregation (entire building stock) makes it possible to identify credible local benchmarks.
Comparability “between peers.” No two buildings are ever identical, but the municipal method aims to bring comparables closer together: we avoid comparing a hospital to a residential building, or a large 24/7 shopping center to a 9-to-5 office building. The quality of your metadata (uses, schedules) is therefore a determining factor in the relevance of the rating.
DECISION-MAKING USE
The rating becomes a tool for dialogue with:
“Not just a rating”: open data, programs, and trajectories
The City publishes its open data on the consumption and GHG emissions of municipal buildings (≥ 2,000 m²), illustrating the aggregation and transparency approach that the rating will generalize to the private sector. The benefit for owners: anticipate the data ecosystem (comparisons, benchmarks, third-party tools) that will emerge around public ratings.
On the policy side, Montreal’s Climate Plan points out that buildings account for ~28% of local emissions, which justifies dedicated actions and the rise of disclosure/rating mechanisms. For a property owner, this means that incentives (technical, financial, regulatory) will continue to evolve in this direction: a ready and costed pipeline of projects becomes a competitive advantage.
Finally, at the Quebec level, Action R3-060 of the PEV 2030 (2025-2030) includes disclosure + rating + performance in a future harmonized provincial framework for the commercial and institutional sector: prepare for methodological convergence and increasingly clear signals on minimum expected performance.
Step 1 — Check eligibility. Confirm that your assets (≥ 2,000 m² or ≥ 25 dwellings) are eligible and locate the building ID in the municipal list. If you manage a multi-building portfolio, consolidate an internal register (municipal ID, ESPM ID, address, use, m², meters).
Step 2 — Map uses. In ESPM, break down the m² by use (e.g., ground floor shops, offices on floors 1-3, residential on floors 4-15). This granularity is key to comparability.
Step 3 — Close the meters. Collect all monthly bills and connect them (electricity, gas, other fuels). Enable automatic transfers (Hydro-Québec, Énergir) when available to secure the data chain.
Step 4 — Quality control. Before June 30, run the ESPM checker:
Step 5 — Share with Montreal. Use the “Montreal — Disclosure Year 20XX” sharing profiles provided by the City to officially transfer your data. Keep internal proof (screenshots, ESPM reports)
Step 6 — Read your GHG intensity. Once your data has stabilized, track your kg CO₂e/m² in ESPM; compare it to your sister assets (same uses). Set an internal target (e.g., -15% over 24 months).
Step 7 — Build a portfolio of measures. Classify them into three categories:
Prioritize according to GHG impact/m² vs. cost vs. complexity. (This step works very well with your own data and city guides.)
Step 8 — Investment roadmap. Place measures over 12-36 months: quick wins (3-9 months), medium-term projects (12-18 months), structural projects (18-36 months). Integrate risk management (reduction of breakdowns, operational stability, comfort).
Step 9 — Governance & communication.
Step 10 — Annual cycle. Repeat: quality control → submission before June 30 → update the plan according to the new rating/results. This discipline puts you one step ahead of upcoming provincial signals (R3-060).
Why now?
Commentaires
Il n'y a pas de commentaires pour le moment.